{"id":3650,"date":"2012-05-24T12:52:18","date_gmt":"2012-05-24T16:52:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/?p=3650"},"modified":"2023-03-28T18:48:33","modified_gmt":"2023-03-28T22:48:33","slug":"hitchhikers-guide-atheism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/hitchhikers-guide-atheism\/","title":{"rendered":"Douglas Adams: What a Wonderful World"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Despite being the ostensible protagonist of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy<\/em>, Arthur Dent is remarkably out of control of his destiny. Throughout, he survives various calamities equipped only with only a Babel fish, towel, and implausible happenstance. But most of its cast of characters are equally adrift in a senseless universe: Zaphod Beeblebrox is the ultimate irresponsible slacker, just hanging out as the universe unfairly happens to produce everything he needs. Ford Prefect just barely clings on to a dead-end travel writing gig in the backwaters of the galaxy. Mr. Prosser and Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz are mere salarymen dispassionately dispatching their duties, too jaded even to evilly enjoy their cataclysmic impact upon others (the symbolic mirroring between these characters was laid bare in the original radio series, where they were both portrayed by the same actor — curiously not the case in the TV show, when it ought to have been trivial to do likewise, considering how much alien makeup was involved).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you’re just joining our trilogy (in three parts… so far) on Douglas Adams and The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, don’t miss Part One<\/a>, on its highly improbable leap from radio to TV, and Part Two<\/a>, on its influence & legacy.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

If the many misfortunes that befall Arthur seem meaningless, and his escapes equally arbitrary, maybe it’s because Adams was one of the world’s most famous atheists. He was friend and matchmaker to outspoken debunker of supernaturalism Richard Dawkins<\/a> — indeed, he introduced to him to his future wife Lalla Ward (who played Romana during Adams’ tenure on Doctor Who<\/em>, and is still revered today as “the lord high queen of the nerds” by Topless Robot<\/a>). It would be extremely convenient to draw connections between Dawkins and the Hitchhiker’s<\/em> character Oolon Colluphid, were the chronology not so inconvenient: the series was written long before Adams discovered Dawkins’ book The Selfish Gene<\/em>, and before they became friends after Dawkins wrote Adams an admitted “fan letter.” Colluphid, of course, wrote the highly influential and controversial trilogy Where God Went Wrong, Some More of God’s Greatest Mistakes and Who is this God Person Anyway?<\/em>, and Well, That About Wraps It Up For God<\/em> — an oeuvre only slightly less pointed than Dawkins’ own.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Lalla
Douglas Adams the matchmaker: Doctor Who star Lalla Ward and evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Absorbing Hitchhikers<\/em>‘ in prose, on stage, TV, or radio has long been the first baby step for many current and future atheists. The first few moments of all versions of the story feature numerous gags about God, the most well-known of which involves the infamous Babel Fish. When I first read the novel as a kid, I was of course pleasantly grossed out by the notion of sticking a fish in your ear. Whether or not a child reader grasps the overt allusion to the biblical Tower of Babel, most would be versed enough in science fiction to recognize that Adams was mocking the accepted convention that English is spoken throughout the universe. Star Trek<\/em> and Doctor Who<\/em> both made offhand comments to explain the language barrier issue in pseudo-scientific manners, which is perhaps the healthiest narrative approach — why get bogged down in technicalities, which only get in the way of telling a good story? But Adams decided to confront the conceit head-on, and not only subvert it but also take it to a startling philosophical conclusion. In literary theory, this would be a casebook example of deconstruction. Here’s the relevant excerpt from the original radio show:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

The Babel Fish is small, yellow, leech like, and probably the oddest thing in the Universe. It feeds on brainwave energy, absorbing all unconscious frequencies and then excreting telepathically a matrix formed from the conscious frequencies and nerve signals picked up from the speech centers of the brain; the practical upshot of which is that if you stick on in your ear you can instantly understand anything said to you in any form of language – the speech you hear decodes the brainwave matrix. Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that anything so mindbogglingly useful could evolve purely by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as a final clinching proof of the non-existence of God.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The argument goes something like this:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“I refuse to prove that I exist,” says God, “for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing”. “But,” says Man, “the Babel fish is a dead giveaway isn’t it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don’t. QED” “Oh dear,” says God, “I hadn’t thought of that,” and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic. “Oh, that was easy” says Man, and for an encore he proves that black is white and gets killed on the next zebra crossing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Most leading theologians claim that this argument is a load of dingo’s kidneys, but that didn’t stop Oolon Coluphid making a small fortune when he used it as the central theme of his best-selling book Well, That About Wraps It Up For God.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Meanwhile, the poor Babel Fish, be effectively removing all barriers to communication between different cultures and races, has caused more and bloodier wars than anything else in the history of creation.<\/p>\nThe Original Hitchhiker Radio Scripts, Douglas Adams, p29-30<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\"The
The Guide entry on The Babel Fish<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The above excerpt is from The Guide<\/em> itself, the book within the book (another gift to literary theorists). The Guide<\/em> is full of useless information, when not outright incorrect, but one wonders if Adams was wistfully imagining a more advanced alien society possessed of greater secular wisdom than our own — one in which even lowly travel guides take it as a given that there is no Flying Spaghetti Monster<\/a>, Invisible Sky Daddy, or Ceiling Cat<\/a> watching over us. What is especially remarkable is how economical the above excerpt is. It’s elegant, concise, and above all, funny. In only a few lines, Adams co-opts two common theistic arguments into a logical equation that God: so-called “irreducible complexity” and the ultimate get-out-of-any-argument gambit, faith. To him, faith and belief aren’t enough when it comes to the really important questions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

“Isn’t belief-that-there-is-not-a-god as irrational, arrogant, etc., as belief-that-there-is-a-god? To which I say ‘no’ for several reasons. First of all I do not believe-that-there-is-not-a-god. I don’t see what belief has got to do with it […] As a carapace for the protection of irrational notions from legitimate questions, however, I think that the word has a lot of mischief to answer for […] I am, however, convinced that there is no god, which is a totally different stance.”<\/p>\nDouglas Adams, interview with American Atheist, quoted in Douglas Adams and God – Portrait of a Radical Atheist by Nicolas Botti<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

To the above, I say “can I get an amen?” The word “belief” is appropriate for matters of superstition, but not for matters of science. The self-professed “radical atheist” we hear from above is considerably more gentle and breezy when he playfully tweaks religion in Hitchhiker’s<\/em>. But it’s easy to imagine how these books might incite the ire of the easily offended Religious Right currently dominating the US political scene. That is, if they were literary-minded enough to sit down and actually attempt to read a book — any book — which clearly they aren’t. Consider how the Monty Python film The Life of Brian<\/em> was famously protested against for precisely the wrong reasons. Its detractors assumed the film mocked Jesus (when it is in fact quite respectful), but failed to recognize that the Pythons’ true target was organized religion itself. This also fascinated Adams:<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

“I am fascinated by religion. (That’s a completely different thing from believing in it!) It has had such an incalculably huge effect on human affairs. What is it? What does it represent? Why have we invented it? How does it keep going? What will become of it? I love to keep poking and prodding at it. I’ve thought about it so much over the years that that fascination is bound to spill over into my writing.”<\/p>\nDouglas Adams, interview with American Atheist<\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The same Christian fundamentalists that decry the ostensible witchcraft at the core of J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter<\/em> books (whether they acknowledge Rowling’s own Christian faith or not) would surely object to the capricious, overtly godless universe in which The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy<\/em> is set.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Speaking of literary-mindedness, for a man who wrote for the all-ages adventure program Doctor Who<\/em>, Adams incorporated very little actual physical violence into Hitchhiker’s<\/em>. It’s interesting that when Arthur and Ford are tortured on the Vogon ship, the means is not waterboarding, electrocution, or solitary confinement, but rather the reading aloud of poetry. For all the power of language to harm, Arthur and Ford are unable to talk their way out of their predicament. This suggests that in the Hitchhiker’s<\/em> universe, literature is either obscure and irrelevant (as seen in some of more unhelpful Guide<\/em> entries, or when Arthur fails to enlighten some cavemen with a game of Scrabble), or outright hostile (such as the aforementioned Vogon poetry, and the official documents that doom Arthur’s house and planet to demolition).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Adams had diverse interests beyond tweaking the noses of theists, and incorporated many gags into Hitchhiker’s<\/em> that would appeal mostly to physicists and statisticians. Two things in particular that preoccupied him were metaphysics and computers, and he was able to put them together in the Deep Thought subplot. Curious humanoids outsource their philosophical questions to a sentient supercomputer tasked with calculating the answer to life, the universe, and everything. The answer “42” is just as meaningless as the question “what do you get if you multiply six by nine?”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to my reading, mathematicians might make sense of this equation if calculated in base 10 — AKA the decimal system — and gamblers would recognize 42 as the sum of all sides of a pair of dice. Unfortunately, these clever mathematicians and gamblers would be no closer to an understanding of the universe as anybody else. The pursuit of the answer and then the question wasted billions of years and immeasurable lives. Thus in one single plot twist, Adams pins a donkey tail on entire religions and whole schools of thought — they’re not just absurd, but also extraordinarily harmful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The supposed irreverent nature of British humor is a tired topic among American geeks that came of age quoting Monty Python<\/em> and Doctor Who<\/em> in outrageously fake accents — even the most crass gags (I’m thinking here of Mrs. Slocomb’s tales regarding her “pussy” on Are You Being Served<\/em>) sound more witty, sophisticated, and erudite to us when spoken in foreign accents. Here’s Adams on this very topic (regional humor that is, not cats):<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

“I think too much is made of the difference between US and UK humour. I don’t think there’s a difference in the way those audiences are treated. […] There are things the British think are as English as roast beef that the Americans think are as American as apple pie. The trick is to write about people. If you write about situations that people recognize then people will respond to it.”<\/p>\nDouglas Adams, quoted in Don’t Panic<\/em> by Neil Gaiman, page 94<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

\"Ricky
Ricky Gervais enjoys a pint at The Golden Globes: “…and thank god for making me an atheist.”<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The alleged great divide between American and British humor came back into relief again recently as Ricky Gervais closed the first of his Golden Globes hosting gigs in 2011. Most of his allegedly uncensored celebrity barbs turned out to be merely tired stabs at low-hanging fruit (certain Scientologists are gay, Charlie Sheen is a junkie, Hugh Hefner is an old creep that gets laid more than you ever will, etc.) that only resulted in more rolled eyes than bruised egos. But what upset outwardly pious Americans most was his closing quip “…and thank god for making me an atheist<\/a>.” Anyone given to appreciating Adams’ cocktail of absurdism, logic, and philosophy would recognize Gervais’ brand of humor here. Unfortunately, the loudest voices in the current American landscape are holy rollers with persecution complexes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Perhaps Adams’ atheism was the motivation behind his personal appearance as an archetypal modern man experiencing an existential crisis in the beginning of episode two of the Hitchhiker’s<\/em> television series. If you believe Neil Gaiman, Adams stepped in simply because the original actor was stuck in traffic that day, but I prefer to imagine a greater significance. Just as Radiohead would later employ Marvin the Paranoid Android as a metaphor for the themes of paranoia and depression in their acclaimed album OK Computer<\/em>, Adams plays a nameless everyman beset by the modern condition. Taking the long view of someone educated in evolution (which an alarming number of Americans believe to be more science fiction than actual sci-fi), he decides that it was all a mistake for life to leave the oceans in the first place.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"Marvin
Marvin the Paranoid Android, looking a little more chipper than usual<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

But there’s a note of optimism to be had at the end of the series, which thanks to the wonderful narrative possibilities of time travel in science fiction, is not really the end but rather the beginning. Arthur, Ford, and the undesirable dregs of an ancient humanoid civilization land on prehistoric Earth and intermingle with brutish cavemen (interestingly, very much the same thing happens at the controversial conclusion to the 2003-09 TV series Battlestar Galactica<\/em>, except much less funny). The series signs off with Louis Armstrong’s “What a Wonderful World” — which works as both a sarcastic comment on humanity’s humble, decidedly not divine origins (we’re descended from interbred hunters & gatherers, hairdressers, and telephone sanitizers) but also as a sincere comment on Arthur and Ford’s begrudging friendship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thanks for reading Part Three of our look back at Hitchhiker’s. Catch up with Part One<\/a>, on its highly improbable leap from radio to TV, and Part Two<\/a>, on its influence & legacy.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

Further reading:<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Douglas Adams and God – Portrait of a Radical Atheist by Nicolas Botti (no longer online: douglasadams.eu\/douglas-adams-and-god-portrait-of-a-radical-atheist)<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Official BBC site: bbc.co.uk\/cult\/hitchhikers<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Official Douglas Adams site: www.douglasadams.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Despite being the ostensible protagonist of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy, Arthur Dent is remarkably out of control of his destiny. Throughout, he survives various calamities equipped only with only a Babel fish, towel, and implausible happenstance. But most of its cast of characters are equally adrift in a senseless universe: Zaphod Beeblebrox is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4372,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1555],"tags":[1365,408,409,1294,1264,975,1561,976,1565,1366,911,31,1566,1567,85,1367],"class_list":["post-3650","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-books","tag-arthur-dent","tag-atheism","tag-atheist","tag-bbc","tag-doctor-who","tag-douglas-adams","tag-ford-prefect","tag-hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy","tag-lalla-ward","tag-marvin-the-paranoid-android","tag-monty-python","tag-neil-gaiman","tag-richard-dawkins","tag-ricky-gervais","tag-science-fiction","tag-zaphod-beeblebrox"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/douglas-adams.jpg","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pa9lhB-WS","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":3643,"url":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/hitchhikers-guide-legacy\/","url_meta":{"origin":3650,"position":0},"title":"The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy: Influence & Legacy","author":"Chad Ossman","date":"May 15, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"Douglas Adams' Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy has been adapted and extended into virtually every media yet conceived by humankind -- if more advanced species elsewhere in the galaxy are able to plug the story directly into their brains, they haven't yet shared the technology with us earthlings. Back on\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Books"","block_context":{"text":"Books","link":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/category\/main-menu\/books\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/Hitchhikers-Guide-to-the-Galaxy.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/Hitchhikers-Guide-to-the-Galaxy.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/Hitchhikers-Guide-to-the-Galaxy.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/Hitchhikers-Guide-to-the-Galaxy.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/Hitchhikers-Guide-to-the-Galaxy.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":3632,"url":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/hitchhikers-guide-tv\/","url_meta":{"origin":3650,"position":1},"title":"The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy: From Radio to TV","author":"Chad Ossman","date":"May 11, 2012","format":false,"excerpt":"British viewers may not blink twice, but it is always interesting for this Yank to note the privileged billing given to screenwriters in BBC programs. The opening credits for the 1981 serial The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy prominently hail \"By DOUGLAS ADAMS\" directly below its dramatically rocky logo, overshadowing\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "Books"","block_context":{"text":"Books","link":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/category\/main-menu\/books\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-bbc.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-bbc.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-bbc.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-bbc.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/05\/hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-bbc.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":36,"url":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/the-hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy\/","url_meta":{"origin":3650,"position":2},"title":"Don’t leave Earth without Garth Jennings’ The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy","author":"Chad Ossman","date":"September 14, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"Yes, officer, I'd like to file a report. You see, I'm being threatened. I received word that If I don't actually start writing stuff in my blog, I'm going to have my virtual pants pulled down in front of at least half a dozen complete strangers with well-tended blogs. Or\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "3 Stars"","block_context":{"text":"3 Stars","link":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/category\/ratings\/3-stars\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"The Hitchhiker\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s Guide to the Galaxy","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2005\/09\/hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-2005.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2005\/09\/hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-2005.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2005\/09\/hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-2005.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2005\/09\/hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-2005.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2005\/09\/hitchhikers-guide-to-the-galaxy-2005.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":5683,"url":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/brad-pitt-works-out-his-daddy-issues-in-space-in-ad-astra\/","url_meta":{"origin":3650,"position":3},"title":"Brad Pitt works out his daddy issues in space, in Ad Astra","author":"Chad Ossman","date":"February 21, 2020","format":false,"excerpt":"Maybe this isn't fair, but I couldn't help but associate Ad Astra with Joker. If Joker is a shallow remix of Taxi Driver and King of Comedy, Ad Astra is a bland smoothie of Solaris and Apocalypse Now, with a cavalcade of stars you may remember from Space Cowboys and\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "2 Stars"","block_context":{"text":"2 Stars","link":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/category\/ratings\/2-stars\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Brad Pitt in Ad Astra","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/ad-astra.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/ad-astra.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/ad-astra.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/ad-astra.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/09\/ad-astra.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":1335,"url":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/ridley-scott-black-rain\/","url_meta":{"origin":3650,"position":4},"title":"Michael Douglas vs. the yakuza in Ridley Scott’s Black Rain","author":"Chad Ossman","date":"November 26, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"Ridley Scott's police thriller Black Rain (1989) opens in New York City at a time when The Meatpacking District actually was a meatpacking district. Tough cop Nick (Michael Douglas) is a ridiculously aggressive, foul-mouthed tough guy who tools around the city astride his crotch rocket. The despised Internal Affairs department\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "2 Stars"","block_context":{"text":"2 Stars","link":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/category\/ratings\/2-stars\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/black-rain-feature.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/black-rain-feature.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/black-rain-feature.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/black-rain-feature.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2008\/11\/black-rain-feature.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]},{"id":5143,"url":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/monty-python-live-mostly-2014-movie-review\/","url_meta":{"origin":3650,"position":5},"title":"Monty Python throws a farewell party for themselves in “Live (Mostly): One Down, Four to Go”","author":"Chad Ossman","date":"October 13, 2018","format":false,"excerpt":"Like many misfit American kids of my generation, my brain was permanently rewired when I discovered the BBC series Monty Python's Flying Circus on PBS in the 1980s. Monty Python, Doctor Who, and The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy formed a triumvirate of British pop culture that gave dorky anglophiles\u2026","rel":"","context":"In "2 Stars"","block_context":{"text":"2 Stars","link":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/category\/ratings\/2-stars\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Monty Python Live (Mostly): One Down, Four to Go","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/monty-python-live-mostly.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/monty-python-live-mostly.jpg?resize=350%2C200&ssl=1 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/monty-python-live-mostly.jpg?resize=525%2C300&ssl=1 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/monty-python-live-mostly.jpg?resize=700%2C400&ssl=1 2x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/monty-python-live-mostly.jpg?resize=1050%2C600&ssl=1 3x"},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3650","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3650"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3650\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8474,"href":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3650\/revisions\/8474"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/4372"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3650"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3650"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chadossman.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3650"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}